| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
PokerSensation Flush
Joined: 18 Nov 2011 Posts: 522
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:25 pm Post subject: wwyd - Advanced PLO players |
|
|
PL Omaha $20(BB)
Hero ($2,560)
BB ($2,000)
BTN ($6,380)
Dealt to Hero 5 4 T T
BTN raises to $70, Hero calls $60, fold
FLOP - $160 3 7 6
Hero checks, BTN checks
TURN - $160 3 7 6 A
Hero checks, BTN bets $120, Hero raises to $500, BTN calls $380
RIVER - $1,160 3 7 6 A 3
Hero??
Is this an obvious b/f? Any other options? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
darrensprengers Misclick

Joined: 10 Jul 2007 Posts: 6900
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:39 pm Post subject: Re: wwyd - Advanced PLO players |
|
|
bet the flop _________________ The next best thing to gambling and winning is gambling and losing.
-- Nick "The Greek" Dandalos |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DCSW7 Straight Flush

Joined: 14 Feb 2007 Posts: 3834 Location: Spewing @ PLO
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:51 pm Post subject: Re: wwyd - Advanced PLO players |
|
|
3 handed?
Pot flop.
Pot turn.
Probably check-call river if it got that far.
(Far from advanced, but thats why I play micro-stakes!) _________________ Not surprised Xavi's been replaced. His pass completion rate was only 89%. Useless. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
oneshotbob Full House

Joined: 06 Aug 2010 Posts: 1273 Location: York, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 2:13 pm Post subject: Re: wwyd - Advanced PLO players |
|
|
the op asks what i would do. I would check call and then curse myself for calling when i knew he had a full house. _________________ @oneshotbobby on twitter |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PokerSensation Flush
Joined: 18 Nov 2011 Posts: 522
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 2:40 pm Post subject: Re: wwyd - Advanced PLO players |
|
|
My image was decent and I was playing tight pre but bet strong on flops and turns - hence the chek raise.
Last edited by PokerSensation on Tue Jun 12, 2012 2:56 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PokerSensation Flush
Joined: 18 Nov 2011 Posts: 522
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 2:50 pm Post subject: Re: wwyd - Advanced PLO players |
|
|
| There are a lot of things to consider here. Making the raise on the turn suggests i can beat AAA as its not a wet board. Then again does villan shove turn with that hand. Anyway, river is a tough spot... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
knifeboy62 Full House

Joined: 05 Nov 2006 Posts: 1428 Location: Bristol
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:40 pm Post subject: Re: wwyd - Advanced PLO players |
|
|
caveat: I am far from advanced player.
Seems to me it would be completely player/history dependent but in the absence of any history I cannot see value of checking the flop. I pot the flop and if called I pot the turn.
It seems weak as hell but I probably c/f the river here as I cannot see any check behind, bet/call hand on the turn that is not a set so I am probably dead.
I would have thought that any advanced player here would re-pot any kind of sub-pot sized river bet by you with their entire range so unless you are prepared to b/f away 40% of your starting stack on river then I can't see a better choice.
PS. if above is nonsense please remember the caveat  _________________ "Brandon Uhl @BrandonUhl
@knifeboy62 @limonpoker Ty mike love your poker game your a boss" - lolz |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jellyface Failed

Joined: 01 Dec 2005 Posts: 600 Location: Embedded
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 12:47 pm Post subject: Re: wwyd - Advanced PLO players |
|
|
This interests me too, and would be great if some more advanced PLO players would comment.
I like the look of the hand, but is it worth a call preflop OOP?
I would probably bet the flop too, but is this a good idea when you have the nuts, but absolutely no redraws? Would you be calling a repot bet with it on either street?
I would be check/folding the river. _________________ IF I WANT A MONKEY I GET A MONKEY. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
barmybadger Straight Flush

Joined: 24 Sep 2006 Posts: 3793 Location: nottinghamshire
|
Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:07 pm Post subject: Re: wwyd - Advanced PLO players |
|
|
the perils of playing uncoordinated hands out of position
definitely a hand you want to win a small pot with quickly and avoid getting into a big pot with.
as it is check fold ...unless thats what they expect _________________ THMF 8 game champion 2010
twitter @barmybadger |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
7pounds One Pair
Joined: 11 Jul 2012 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2012 12:15 am Post subject: Re: wwyd - Advanced PLO players |
|
|
Yeah its a tricky spot, whats the hands he is calling you on the river
A58 A89 A910 and 2 pairs ,and any of these is unlikely, u cutting 10 and others he would c bet on flop , rational thinking I would check call |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Dean Straight Flush

Joined: 02 Feb 2007 Posts: 3115 Location: with position on you
|
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:48 pm Post subject: Re: wwyd - Advanced PLO players |
|
|
To deduce what we need to do on the river then we need to play the hand backwards from the river based on what we know about villain......need more info on this guy.......what do you have on him?
Pre-flop call is fine three handed when looked at in a vaccum as your equity stacks well againts a raisers range.
Off the top of my head then betting for value looks shaky as it is difficult to see him call with worse after your turn c/r line and the board pairing on the river. Would imagine this game would be very aggressive and so he has far more than AA when he flats the turn but this depends on your image........need loads more info here to reach a decision. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joe The Elegance Beevers Mobster

Joined: 18 Sep 2003 Posts: 1871
|
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:17 pm Post subject: Re: wwyd - Advanced PLO players |
|
|
I don't mind the call too much 3 handed preflop. In a full game I don't call that raise from the small blind though.
Some times I would bet this flop, sometimes I would check to raise and sometimes even check just to call. You have a horrible (probably the worst) nut straight but at least there are no flush draws. 29 cards change the nuts (less the 4 that are in your hand) and unless you pick up your one back door flush draw or turn a ten your hand is going nowhere.
In order to decide what to do you have to put him on a hand.
If he had a hand like 78910 he would almost certainly have bet the flop as many wouldn't even mind getting it all in in a spot like that. As he checks on the button I don't give him a hand like that now.
Your check raise on the turn is massive. There are still no flush draws. We have ruled out most straight wraps or wraps with pairs.
It is very tough to call on the turn with two pair unless there is history.
He could have a set of 6s or 7s and he checked the flop for deception. He could have a set of aces.
I almost certainly check fold the river in this exact spot.
He has to likely give you the straight. He can't have nothing, the turn play is way too strong for that. Some players would call with the straight even after the board pairs so he is very likely to have the straight beaten.
For me the defining play here is the big call of your turn raise. That tells you his hand. _________________ Play online with The Mob at Genting Poker |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Dean Straight Flush

Joined: 02 Feb 2007 Posts: 3115 Location: with position on you
|
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2012 5:18 pm Post subject: Re: wwyd - Advanced PLO players |
|
|
| Joe The Elegance Beevers wrote: |
For me the defining play here is the big call of your turn raise. That tells you his hand. |
Joe.....I have never played PLO at this stake level but surely when three handed then play cannot be that transparent and especially when there is meta game history. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joe The Elegance Beevers Mobster

Joined: 18 Sep 2003 Posts: 1871
|
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2012 8:10 pm Post subject: Re: wwyd - Advanced PLO players |
|
|
Carl wrote:
| Quote: | | it is difficult to see him call with worse after your turn c/r line |
I agreed with you.
If there is history then of course I could be wrong. I could be wrong anyway. Maybe I keep things too simple and maybe I get outplayed as a result sometimes.
I do feel very strongly though that any player who calls this big raise on the turn is not doing it with metagame (what does that even mean?) reasons. They are doing it with a hand that can improve to beat a straight.
The cards that are dealt don't know that it is three handed. Three handed changes some things but not others.
I think most times this happens the check fold on the river is correct.
I mean to call in order to bluff if it pairs with no hand can not be profitable. Firstly more often it doesn't pair and then some players will still call down with the made straight anyway but you might call to bluff, catch the perfect card and still lose.
IF a player was calling to bluff there would usually be more draws such as flush draws. A player might call with a set knowing that he will bluff the flush if it comes. That sort of thing is less likely here as there are no flush draws. There are just the bigger straight draws and the full house possibility.
You also have to ask what will the button do if the 7 high straight is still the nuts on the river and we make another big bet as that is what he can expect after the c/r line on the turn.
I believe that most players would simply pass for the big turn raise with any other hand. _________________ Play online with The Mob at Genting Poker |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Dean Straight Flush

Joined: 02 Feb 2007 Posts: 3115 Location: with position on you
|
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 10:17 am Post subject: Re: wwyd - Advanced PLO players |
|
|
| Joe The Elegance Beevers wrote: |
metagame (what does that even mean?) reasons. |
I think the definition is something like using external reasons to affect internal decisions or external game reasons to affect internal game actions.......or to put it another way.....probably what the individual wants it to mean
The term "Metagame" is a bit vague in a similar way to "value" in betting and "tells" in poker in that sometimes wolley and illogical reasons can be used to "explain" decision making processes which are often just nothing short of excuses for people not understanding why they are doing what they are doing.
I probably should have used a different word  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|