| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
StGilmore Straight Flush

Joined: 12 May 2010 Posts: 2830 Location: nil fhios agam
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 9:16 pm Post subject: PLO players |
|
|
So this is a £.10/.20 cash game...
I'm 7hQc9hAc... I thought I played this well as in if I err, then I want it to be more on the aggressive side than the passive side. I'm focusing on being aggressive with nut draws (obv). For what it's worth, I put opponent on two pair or a set.
My motivation for posting this is that my opponent was a player I respect a lot and his chat message after this hand was only: bad Whereas his chat messages to other winning players has been: nh
 _________________ "I find it's best to start the day with no composure and then you've got nothing to lose." B. Boatman
http://midlifepoker.blogspot.com/
http://outthescammers.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
timped Straight

Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 205 Location: Ipswich
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 10:49 pm Post subject: Re: PLO players |
|
|
As my old ma used to say I should look before i speak. _________________ GottheStones on Genting.
Last edited by timped on Fri Jun 01, 2012 11:41 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PokerSensation Flush
Joined: 18 Nov 2011 Posts: 522
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 10:56 pm Post subject: Re: PLO players |
|
|
I don't really like the way you played it.
I would have probably bet the pot pre but that is irrelevant.
The raise on the flop is ok but i would have called. You only have a flush draw and nothing else (not up and down etc). You are building a big pot without a real hand yet. I think the main point for me not doing this is that it is a really small pot - if it were a big pot that is a different story.
So you are most likely to brick on the turn which you did. You also have a gutshot now but you know to be good you must probably have to hit a club that doesn't pair the board or a ten. You are a dog here. You were lucky to hit after jamming your stack in when you are obviously getting looked up.
Now if it were a big pot to begin with then its fine but it wasn't.
Last edited by PokerSensation on Fri Jun 01, 2012 11:01 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PokerSensation Flush
Joined: 18 Nov 2011 Posts: 522
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 10:57 pm Post subject: Re: PLO players |
|
|
| timped wrote: | | If he raises on turn maybe he gets rid of you, but as he check calls, he has no leg to stand on, the only time he bets is on river when you have the nuts, played well as far as I am concerned. |
Doesn't the above show the action on the turn?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
timped Straight

Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 205 Location: Ipswich
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 11:03 pm Post subject: Re: PLO players |
|
|
| PokerSensation wrote: | | timped wrote: | | If he raises on turn maybe he gets rid of you, but as he check calls, he has no leg to stand on, the only time he bets is on river when you have the nuts, played well as far as I am concerned. |
Doesn't the above show the action on the turn?? |
The action on the turn was check by kk34 then raise by an other then re raise by op. _________________ GottheStones on Genting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jackdaw Full House
Joined: 01 Oct 2005 Posts: 956 Location: Dorset
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 11:04 pm Post subject: Re: PLO players |
|
|
| timped wrote: | | I was at the table and saw the comment, which I felt was slightly odd but said out of frustration rather than as a comment on your play. If he raises on turn maybe he gets rid of you, but as he check calls, he has no leg to stand on, the only time he bets is on river when you have the nuts, played well as far as I am concerned. |
Is that right? Looks like he leads out on the turn and I'm assuming that after Gilmore's raise one player was all in and Gilmore rivers him. If that's right you're raising on the turn with 10 outs. You don't have the correct odds.
FWIW I raise pre.
I hate this format of hand history, really confusing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PokerSensation Flush
Joined: 18 Nov 2011 Posts: 522
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 11:06 pm Post subject: Re: PLO players |
|
|
| timped wrote: | | PokerSensation wrote: | | timped wrote: | | If he raises on turn maybe he gets rid of you, but as he check calls, he has no leg to stand on, the only time he bets is on river when you have the nuts, played well as far as I am concerned. |
Doesn't the above show the action on the turn?? |
The action on the turn was check by kk34 then raise by an other then re raise by op. |
Then why does it show the guy make top set with KK - lead out for 4.30, get raised to 11.70 - call - then 6 of clubs on the river??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
timped Straight

Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 205 Location: Ipswich
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 11:08 pm Post subject: Re: PLO players |
|
|
You have me doubting myself now but I think there is just a line missing but yes it changes it all if thats the case. Will see if I can find it on my hand history. _________________ GottheStones on Genting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PokerSensation Flush
Joined: 18 Nov 2011 Posts: 522
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 11:13 pm Post subject: Re: PLO players |
|
|
| timped wrote: | | You have me doubting myself now but I think there is just a line missing but yes it changes it all if thats the case. Will see if I can find it on my hand history. |
It must be the turn as nobody would possibly play so badly on the river. It also makes sense given the flop bets etc to get that size bet on the turn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
timped Straight

Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 205 Location: Ipswich
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 11:25 pm Post subject: Re: PLO players |
|
|
| PokerSensation wrote: | | timped wrote: | | You have me doubting myself now but I think there is just a line missing but yes it changes it all if thats the case. Will see if I can find it on my hand history. |
It must be the turn as nobody would possibly play so badly on the river. It also makes sense given the flop bets etc to get that size bet on the turn. |
Just looked it up. Yep your right mis read hand when 1st saw it. _________________ GottheStones on Genting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
timped Straight

Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 205 Location: Ipswich
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 11:26 pm Post subject: Re: PLO players |
|
|
I shall STFU now. _________________ GottheStones on Genting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PokerSensation Flush
Joined: 18 Nov 2011 Posts: 522
|
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 11:46 pm Post subject: Re: PLO players |
|
|
| lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
StGilmore Straight Flush

Joined: 12 May 2010 Posts: 2830 Location: nil fhios agam
|
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 12:56 pm Post subject: Re: PLO players |
|
|
Well Timped I actually mis-read my hand a bit (and the HH) it turns out - I thought I had another straight draw out - so I had only 12 nut outs.
PokerS I see what you mean about raising pre vs on the flop.
So but then on the turn- do you fold or just flat call? I actually thought by shoving I had fold equity which I can see now is another mistake- even though I definitely didn't think he had top set.
Definitley clearer on why he said 'bad' now.  _________________ "I find it's best to start the day with no composure and then you've got nothing to lose." B. Boatman
http://midlifepoker.blogspot.com/
http://outthescammers.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jackdaw Full House
Joined: 01 Oct 2005 Posts: 956 Location: Dorset
|
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 1:02 pm Post subject: Re: PLO players |
|
|
| 10 outs not 12. 7 clubs (two of them give him a better hand, FH or quad kings) and the 3 tens (you've already counted the 10 of clubs). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
StGilmore Straight Flush

Joined: 12 May 2010 Posts: 2830 Location: nil fhios agam
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|