Daniel Negreanu latest video blog (and Doyle Brunson)

[Bogus]

[DropTheHammer]

Well it's the usual veiled aggro or sarchasm towards someone from WBPP, despite bravely hiding behind anonymity.

[The Dean]

It may be easy for me to talk because I didn't lose anything when FTP went belly up but Doyle's response seems to make more sense to me. It is difficult to say who knew what but in situations like these then things are a hell of a lot more complex than people think as a rule and are certainly not black and white.

But as Doyle said.......time will tell us many things.
_________________
Poker columnist at www.poker.co.uk

[StGilmore]

[Jools]

Doyleism of the Day: "When You Are Up Your Friends Know Who You Are, When You Are Down You Know Who Your Friends Are."

http://www.cardplayer.com/poker-blogs...-your-friends-are

Interesting opinions.

[uh-hu]

i think Doyle is talking out of his 10gallon hat on this one tbh

Im not a lederer hater at all,in fact Lederer was the person i first remember/saw talking about and teaching pot odds/drawing odds.Was some programme yrs ago.i remember going on my internet and getting a printout of his odds chart and poker becoming something more than just a game to me.

But i truelly believe (right or wrong i might be) that Howard and Chris both knew exactly what the situation was/is at FTP at the moment of the crash and long b4 it too.

His silence is proving that.


If your name was being dragged through the mud daily would u not at least once give some sort of interview to just say something like this >

"i am not allowed to talk about any of the ins and outs of this case but i assure you all i am innocent of all accusations"

[The Dean]

[uh-hu]

[The Dean]

[WBPP]

[gandalf55]

MODS, leave my thread titles alone. I don't come round yours and open your personal post, do I?
_________________
I'narr en gothrim glinuva nuin I'anor

Gurth gothrim Tel'Quessir

[Grumbledook]

no, but when people are starting new threads cause they don't know something is being talked about in another one I'm going to go ahead and keep merging and renaming

what's wrong with it anyway?

[gandalf55]

[gherkin]

I think it was pretty ill-judged for Doyle to say what he did, why he would want (or see reason) to defend them is beyond me.

I agree we don't fully know the facts but what we do know is that at the very best Lederer and Ferguson are scum bags for the way they have acted afterwards - and that is best case scenario, it is more than likely they were fully aware of what was going on.

[TheBlueBoy]

I'm guessing their silence is because of some lawyer potentially taking it out of context to use against them. Anything anyone says can be misconstrued because of context or inflection, looks very different in black and white, or being read eloquently in court. It's hard remembering the banter you had with your mates last night, imagine the amount of people who would ask them questions, ducking them would be analysed one way, answering them another, I guess nothing will be heard in public 'til they're under oath.