Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 View previous topic :: View next topic  
Daniel
Straight


Joined: 24 Sep 2011
Posts: 248

PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:31 pm
View user's profile Send private message Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote
Wish I had watched it before posting what I said before. Don't think it was nearly as bad as people made out earlier. I had visions of him agreeing a deal with everyone, shaking hands and them all celebrating with their rails, patting backs etc. But it was nothing like that.

Not only would I not use the word scummy, I don't think he actually did anything wrong. Some people might not like it, but I don't think he did anything morally wrong, never mind not breaking any rules etc. They were discussing a deal, he said no to the first deal proposed, told them the minimum he would need to do a deal, which 2 of the others agreed to, and the other took ages to think about. While the itallian went to his rail to discuss it first, Tom went to his, and they basically offered him a better deal. They guraranteed what he wanted as a mimimum, and took the gamble themselves that he would go on to win more.

To be fair, the deal as it stood wasn't that great for him. He needed to go on to win the event, to get even close to 2nd place prize Money. And doing a deal, that all 4 people are going to be happy with, is going to be very difficult. I see what people are saying, that he shouldn't get advice, but the itallian got advice, and it seems his friends said to take it, but at the same time Toms backers said something else, so it Works both ways.

I guess to some people, Tom's backers taking the risk and guaranteeing Tom's share seems a bit off, but it is the real world, and these things happen. So I think its good that its all done on camera, and not off camera and have the organisers claim that no deals are done.

If I was the organiser, I would have the players discuss it for 5 mins, then go to the rail to discuss with backers Family friends etc, then they have 5 minutes to agree or not, no deal back to poker.

I really don't think Tom offered a deal, then went back on it. There was a deal suggested, he said he didn't like it, and he explained why, and said what he would need. Some agreed but not everyone, and by the time everyone did agree, he had changed his mind. If the Italian was able to say no, but change his mind after speaking to his corner, it seems only fair, that Tom or any of the others can change their mind to say no after initially saying yes.

I would say this is the online equivalent of agreeing to deal by clicking the box, but not actually wanting to accept the ICM numbers and the others not agreeing to the share you want. Maybe some don't like it, especially the part with the backers, but I am 100% certain this has happened many times before in other tournaments, here we just got to see everything, and for me, thats better.
_________________
Poker blog, rants, brags, and random thoughts type of thing: http://bonusbanter.com/threads/6467-Negreanu-20-challenge
SamJess
Straight


Joined: 09 Nov 2009
Posts: 367
Location: Wales

PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 11:29 pm
View user's profile Send private message Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote
I don't think Tom does much wrong here to be honest. (And its all been said before - see Daniels post.)

The Key point for me was that 1 player agreed to the deal very quickly and the backers/rail clearly thought Tom could exploit this 'weakness' as he was to his immediate left thus ensuring a higher amount.

From a money and winning strategy perspective this was probably the correct thing to do.

I don't know Tom but sometimes you need to be told to go for the monster win when the sensible head is saying take the money.
_________________
Run well, play well, win.
The 'Ted Rogers' Forum Challenge Champion
Matt101
Straight Flush


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 3285

PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 11:45 pm
View user's profile Send private message Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote
After watching the link, I agree 100% with Daniel. Also, I'm not sure of this and I'm not sure if it's still the case, but these were Tom's long-term backers (guys that stake him to play online and whom he could have been in shedloads of make-up with). There is a difference between this set-up and guys that just buy some action for a one-off tourney imo. They're effectively his bosses and pull the strings on a number of things, one of which includes whether to accept certain deals or not.
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Hendon Mob Forum Index -> Mob Poker Forum All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Page 4 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum